Shop this title
Shop this title
Clarence
We may earn a commission from purchases through these links.
Search US stores by format. Check the title and edition before buying.
Explore Prime Video — Opens in a new tab
Catalog availability and subscription terms vary.
Shop
Shop this title
Clarence
We may earn a commission from purchases through these links.
Search US stores by format. Check the title and edition before buying.
Explore Prime Video — Opens in a new tab
Catalog availability and subscription terms vary.
Wokeometer Rating
3Based
Scale: 0 = not woke, 10 = maximally woke
TL;DR Verdict
Clarence Season 1 stays a safe, neutral watch by keeping the focus on kid adventures, friendship, and suburban antics rather than any agenda. Its low 3/10 score comes from incidental character details that never steer the story.
Paid creator placementsFeature your article or video on this page
Detailed Analysis
Clarence Season 1 centers on the everyday misadventures of optimistic, chubby protagonist Clarence and his core trio of male friends (Jeff and Sumo) in a suburban setting, with plots revolving around fast-food play areas, arcades, school pranks, tree forts, crushes, and gross-out humor.
Progressive elements appear only incidentally: Jeff has two lesbian mothers (EJ and Sue, voiced by Lea DeLaria and Tig Notaro) shown in supportive parental roles across a few episodes like "Jeff Wins," and episode 21 ("Neighborhood Grill") includes a brief, non-plot-driving cameo of two men kissing on the cheek after network pushback altered an originally more explicit version. A new student character named Balance has a hook hand, treated as just another kid Clarence befriends. These details reflect organic family and character variety rather than activist framing or narrative drivers.
Key Factors
- Lesbian mothers for recurring character Jeff shown as normal parents without lectures or focus
- Brief gay male couple cameo in one episode after network censorship
- Organic diversity among original child characters (body types, ethnicities, minor disability) without source swaps or identity politics as premise
- Counterbalancing traditional elements like defense of boys-only tree fort in "Too Gross for Comfort" and standard kid-crush/girlfriend episodes
- No creator statements tying the season to social justice activism; storytelling remains silly, episodic, and entertainment-focused.
Methodology: Each score synthesizes audience discourse, critic and aggregator reception, and press coverage — weighed against the work itself, not any single source.
Detailed BreakdownPro
Identity Politics & Racial Essentialism
Gender Ideology & LGBTQ+ Themes
DEI Casting & Representation Mandates
Preachiness & Message-First Agenda
Corporate & Creator Activism
See how this title scores across all 5 woke subcategories with detailed explanations.
Unlock with ProFrom $3/month · 3-day trial for $1
The Woke Report
A curated roundup of newly scored movies, shows, and games, with the context behind the scores. Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Privacy policyDirected by
Is Clarence - Season 1 Woke?
We've run a full content analysis on Clarence - Season 1 and scored it 3/10 on the woke scale. Read our detailed breakdown above to see exactly what we found.
Frequently Asked Questions
What kind of woke content is in Clarence - Season 1?
Our analysis checks for themes like identity politics, race-swapping, gender ideology, environmental activism, anti-religious messaging, and other progressive agenda elements. The score breakdown above shows which specific categories were flagged and how heavily they factor into Clarence - Season 1's overall score.
Is Clarence - Season 1 family-friendly?
Wokeometer focuses on ideological content rather than traditional ratings (violence, language, etc.). Clarence - Season 1 is rated TV-PG. For a full picture, combine our woke analysis with the age rating to decide if it's right for your family.
How does Wokeometer score tv shows?
We evaluate media across multiple ideological categories on a 0–10 scale. Scores of 0–3 mean story-first, 4–6 have moderate elements, and 7–10 flag heavily agenda-driven content. Learn more about our methodology →
