This setup elevates critiques of misogyny and perceived systemic sexism in male-dominated fields as the core conflict, with the killer's manifesto and actions introduced via opening voiceover. Such framing turns a real tragedy into a vehicle for progressive gender ideology, forcing the narrative to prioritize societal patriarchy over individual pathology and reducing entertainment value by subordinating plot to ideological messaging. Director emphasis on the killer's worldview combined with multiple victim perspectives and flashbacks further embeds gender division and societal sexism as foundational elements.

The structure repeatedly returns to these themes to portray the event as emblematic of broader patriarchal hostility, which intrudes on storytelling by design and crowds out alternative interpretations. This approach locks the audience into a predetermined progressive lens rather than allowing organic exploration of the incident.