

Enola Holmes 3 earns a 7/10 woke score for race-swapping Moriarty and Watson while centering anti-empire guilt over stolen Afghan gold and colonial sins. Avoid it if you want classic mystery without the lectures.
Enola Holmes 3 earns a 7 due to deliberate casting alterations and thematic framing that embed progressive critiques of empire and identity into the mystery-adventure structure.
Sharon Duncan-Brewster, a Black actress, reprises the role of Moriarty (revealed as Mira Troy/Professor Adeline Rathe), a gender- and race-swapped version of the canonical male villain whose motivations in the prior film explicitly tied to revenge for systemic injustices; the third installment deepens this with her kidnapping Sherlock and political maneuvering in Malta. Himesh Patel, of Indian descent, plays Dr. John Watson, another established character race-swapped from the traditional white portrayal.
The central plot revolves around British colonial crimes, including stolen Afghan gold from the Battle of Khost transported to Malta, with Enola and Sherlock ensuring its return to Afghanistan as acknowledgment that 'it never belonged to Britain,' while Tewkesbury renounces his title and Lords seat upon learning of his father's imperial involvement. Writer Jack Thorne intentionally fictionalized these elements to explore 'the complication of empire' and Malta's colonial status.
Enola's wedding-to-Tewkesbury arc foregrounds female independence versus marriage in Victorian society as a recurring conflict. Audience and critic responses show mixed reception with a 69% Rotten Tomatoes score and complaints about formulaic execution, though without widespread 'go woke go broke' labeling; one analysis site scored it 4/10 on woke metrics, understating the centrality of the empire subplot.
Methodology: Each score synthesizes audience discourse, critic and aggregator reception, and press coverage — weighed against the work itself, not any single source.
Writer Jack Thorne explicitly fictionalized historical elements to explore 'the complication of empire' and Malta's colonial status, integrating progressive critiques of imperialism into the adventure framework as a deliberate creative choice.
Unlock the other 4 categories — including Identity Politics and Gender Ideology — with detailed explanations.
Unlock with ProFrom $3/month · 3-day trial for $1
Every Friday: the week's most ideologically-loaded releases, scored — with the breakdown the headlines skip. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
We've run a full content analysis on Enola Holmes 3 and scored it 7/10 on the woke scale. Read our detailed breakdown above to see exactly what we found.
Audience Fitis the inverse of the community's average woke rating of 9.3/10: the less woke our audience finds a title, the more stars it earns. Based on 3 audience ratings.
Our analysis checks for themes like identity politics, race-swapping, gender ideology, environmental activism, anti-religious messaging, and other progressive agenda elements. The score breakdown above shows which specific categories were flagged and how heavily they factor into Enola Holmes 3's overall score.
Wokeometer focuses on ideological content rather than traditional ratings (violence, language, etc.). Enola Holmes 3 is rated PG-13. For a full picture, combine our woke analysis with the age ratingto decide if it's right for your family.
We evaluate media across multiple ideological categories on a 0–10 scale. Scores of 0–3 mean story-first, 4–6 have moderate elements, and 7–10 flag heavily agenda-driven content. Learn more about our methodology →
Similar titles you might enjoy

Race/gender swapping Moriarity. Race swapping Holmes. All the "colonials were bad and white people are privileged because of it" crap. And the wedding scene where the woman is seen as the leader (You may now kiss the husband). Story would have been fine without all the crap. Hopefully this ends the Enola Holmes series.
A really, really bad film, lecturing me that, as I am British, I am somehow complicit in slay very (the only censors won't allow me to write this word out properly) of the 1800s. My ancestors most certainly didn't benefit working on farms, eking out an existence on a pittance. Awful and patronizing
You can't type slavery?